![]() ![]() To date, the ICTY’s decision in the Tadi ć case and the study done by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) on the customary status of international humanitarian law (IHL) are two sources which can be useful in the classification of conflicts.Īccordingly, the main purpose of this post is to address the issue regarding the need for a continued distinction between international and non-international armed conflicts and whether all forms of armed conflict should come under a single collective legal regime. Factors which can contribute to the difficulty in categorising these cases might be the status of the participants involved and the reasons for international intervention if any. Examples of such instances may include the conflicts that took place in the former Yugoslavia and Georgian-Russian conflict in 2008. Furthermore, there are certain situations where it would not be easy to classify categorically. Consequently, this leads to a perplexity as a more comprehensive set of rules applies to a form of armed conflict that has not been prevalent since the turn of the new century. religious and civil wars) have sharply increased in occurrence and is fast becoming the preponderant form of armed conflict. However, there has been a growing resemblance between the types of armed conflict taking place. At present, the set of rules which govern international armed conflicts are more distinct and well-defined than those relating to non-international armed conflicts which are somewhat limited. ![]() ![]() International and non-international armed conflicts (IAC and NIAC) are two forms of armed conflict recognised under international law. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |